Should the Swissair grounding have been prevented 25 years ago?

Yes, absolutely: the state should have rescued Swissair by all means reaches 21 percent with 42 votes.

Yes, but only with clear conditions and private-sector participation reaches 21 percent with 41 votes.

It depends on whether the airline was viable reaches 19 percent with 37 votes.

Rather not: the state should only have limited the collateral damage reaches 19 percent with 37 votes.

No, mismanagement must not be rewarded with taxpayers' money reaches 20 percent with 40 votes.

Yes, systemically important companies should always be supported reaches 23 percent with 46 votes.

Yes, but only with something in return, such as a stake or a bonus freeze reaches 21 percent with 42 votes.

Only for critical infrastructure and as a repayable loan reaches 12 percent with 23 votes.

Rather not: the state should at most provide bridge financing reaches 23 percent with 45 votes.

No, exiting the market is part of a market economy reaches 21 percent with 41 votes.

A lot of trust: leaders generally know what they are doing reaches 15 percent with 29 votes.

Rather trust, as long as control and oversight are sound reaches 32 percent with 63 votes.

Neither, it depends on the company reaches 18 percent with 35 votes.

Rather distrust: stricter rules for managers are needed reaches 19 percent with 38 votes.

Little trust: the business elite is too far removed from the public reaches 16 percent with 32 votes.

No, an independent Swiss airline was valuable reaches 16 percent with 32 votes.

Rather no, the risks of a merger were too great reaches 33 percent with 65 votes.

Only as a fair partnership between equals reaches 13 percent with 25 votes.

Rather yes, an early alliance would have strengthened Swissair reaches 14 percent with 27 votes.

Yes, a merger would have been the better path reaches 24 percent with 48 votes.